LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for OPERA-L Archives

OPERA-L Archives

OPERA-L Archives


Next Message | Previous Message
Next in Topic | Previous in Topic
Next by Same Author | Previous by Same Author
Chronologically | Most Recent First
Proportional Font | Monospaced Font


Join or Leave OPERA-L
Reply | Post New Message
Search Archives

Subject: Re: Why Sutherland is confusing (and Bjoerling)
From: tom kabaker <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:tom kabaker <[log in to unmask]>
Date:Thu, 24 Dec 1998 13:29:03 -0600

text/plain (24 lines)

I also liked the post about Sutherland. Mr Bowman should come out of lurkdom
more often.

I'd like to add a couple of words about acting in a verismo fashion. I'm not
quite sure what this is supposed to mean. Mary Garden was considered to have
an astonishing stage presence. She was hailed for her acting ability and the
truthfulness she brought to operatic performances. However, when you read
the reviews, they talk about the wonderful "attitudes" she struck, etc. In
other words, think silent movies. Silents may seem corny to us now, but that
was considered good acting then, and those funny old films were made in the
hayday of verismo.

What Callas did was not verismo acting, at least in the sense that it
represented stage deportment in the 1890s through what? 1920? As has been
often noted before, our interest in authentic performance practice musically
has not extended to dramatic recreations of what went on. I'm not sure it

As for making singing sound too easy, that's a good point. I particularly
think of Behrens' Brunhilde of about 10-12 years ago. Part of the excitement
was listening to her sing through her vocal limitations. I never got that
kind of excitement form Nilsson, who could sing circles around Behrens.

Happy holidays to all.

Back to: Top of Message | Previous Page | Main OPERA-L Page



CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager