> -----Original Message-----
> Michael Giuseffi wrote, in part:
>I read about this performance yesterday on the list, and couldn't wait. I
>must refute yesterday's poster who claimed that the sound was just okay.
>Honey, I don't know what you expected but this is one of the best sounding
>live recordings I've ever heard. It is obviously an FM stereo broadcast,
and >frankly, the sound is better by far than the current Met broadcasts.
What I expected is a well-balanced, well imaged recording with no obvious
tonal distortion. The bass on this recording is very exaggerated, and every
voice acquires a bit of "edge" that expereience tells me was not the way it
sounded in the house. Current MET broadcasts are, in my opinion, sonically
challenged - it sounds as though all the voices are recorded via lapel
mics. Even so, I would say the broadcasts I have heard are better than this
Lecouvreur. I would agree that the source is an FM stereo broadcast, but I
find the sound less pleasing than, say, the Vienna Don Carlo on Opera d'Oro,
and most recordings that originate from stereo broadcasts in the last 2
decades. In any case, I am glad you enjoyed the performance, I think we can
agree that the sound is "at worst" acceptable, and it is a terrific bargain.
[log in to unmask]
P.S. I don't appreciate being referred to as "Honey" by anyone except my