LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for OPERA-L Archives

OPERA-L Archives

OPERA-L Archives


Next Message | Previous Message
Next in Topic | Previous in Topic
Next by Same Author | Previous by Same Author
Chronologically | Most Recent First
Proportional Font | Monospaced Font


Join or Leave OPERA-L
Reply | Post New Message
Search Archives

Subject: Re: Levine
From: Kiwi <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:Kiwi <[log in to unmask]>
Date:Tue, 5 Dec 2017 13:02:08 -0500

text/plain (49 lines)

I find all this so upsetting that I can't quite make sense out of it. 
Apparently, the decades-old rumors about Levine were widely known by 
management (who, indeed, may have even participated in covering up the open 
secret by providing pay-outs to victims), board members, musicians and 
audience members--and yet nothing was ever done until Levine was old and 
growing less reliable as a conductor--in short, until his sell-by date had 
passed.  Now Peter Gelb declares he is deeply disturbed by the latest 
reports (but only once they become reportable in the press, not before when 
he and the board members were quietly cleaning up mess after mess) and finds 
it a tragedy for anyone whose life has been affected.  And yet, management, 
board members, musicians and audiences at no time sanctioned Levine.  How 
about all those mothers and fathers who brought their kids to the Met or 
whose kids participated in Met productions or other venues where Levine 
worked?  Did anyone warn them about potential risks?  Did anyone mention 
that the health and wellbeing of their child might be at risk?

All those audience members who sat through a Levine performance and who knew 
the 'rumor':  what sort of justification can be used?  That Levine wouldn't 
approach them directly because they were adults?  It didn't matter because 
no one in their family or in their social group were affected?  It's just 
music and he couldn't harm anyone while waving around his baton?  All those 
glowing praises bestowed on Levine by people WHO KNEW he was preying on kids 
and who didn't care because they put their aural pleasure first?

OK, I get it:  we want what we want when we want it, and everything else be 
damned.  But we are talking kids here, and don't we all, at some point in 
our lives, need to take a deep breath and say enough is enough?  I'll give 
this one thing up, the thing I love, if it saves another?

Or is that too idealistic?  Do we all just hold ourselves so entitled that 
we no longer care about those who can't protect themselves?

And, please, I've had a couple of folks who compared the apple/Wagner to the 
orange/Levine.  One (as far as I know) was verbally anti-Semitic;  the other 
was physically assaulting boys.    I'm not sure I see a clear parallel 
but....I guess whatever floats your entitled boat works for you.

OPERA-L on Facebook:
To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message to [log in to unmask]
containing only the words:  SIGNOFF OPERA-L
To stay subscribed but TURN OFF mail, send a message to
[log in to unmask] containing only the words:  SET OPERA-L NOMAIL
Modify your settings:

Back to: Top of Message | Previous Page | Main OPERA-L Page



CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager