LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for OPERA-L Archives

OPERA-L Archives

OPERA-L Archives


Next Message | Previous Message
Next in Topic | Previous in Topic
Next by Same Author | Previous by Same Author
Chronologically | Most Recent First
Proportional Font | Monospaced Font


Join or Leave OPERA-L
Reply | Post New Message
Search Archives

Subject: Re: Opera News Online
From: Peggy Houdek <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:Peggy Houdek <[log in to unmask]>
Date:Sat, 19 Nov 2016 12:09:17 -0500

text/plain (42 lines)


(,,,) ^..^(,,,)

I agree completely.  I began subscribing to Opera News when I was 12 — that’s a LONG time ago.  I subscribed for many years and then stopped for a few years.  I decided I missed it, so resubscribed this past year.  I too find that I look through it, but barely read anything.  I get more information on Opera L and other websites, so I think I’ll not resubscribe.  n When I moved about a year ago I had to throw away many boxes of them as no one wanted them. Sad, but it’s silly to have piles of magazines sitting around unread.  peggy, no longer peggy from lenox

> On Nov 19, 2016, at 11:50 AM, Kiwi <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Agree completely.   A couple of years ago, I think, there was an issue which had some light criticism of the Met or Met management--forget the specific details--and Mr. Gelb was having none of that.  Although at the time Opera News was associated with the Met, it also had some independence (necessary for legitimacy) and so was able to be a more balanced, interesting magazine. After that incident, it seems to me the entire purpose for Opera News changed and it became simple PR, with no bite, little zing, and much fluff and stuff.  Even the reviews seem telescoped through a PR vantage point.
> They also seem highly politicalized.  They did a series of reviews from the Salzburg Summer Festival--and left out the big draw of Otello completely. Good, bad, or indifferent, the production was the centerpiece and they ignored it.  To my eyes, they seem to be spending more time of US theaters (big and small) than on major European houses.  Maybe that's what the crowd wants but for many of us, especially the 'ugly Americans' who are severely language impaired (guilty, though I have tried!) the only way to keep up with what happens on the continent is to have a mag like Opera News report. And NOT just on the productions which star the singers who will be appearing at the Met in upcoming productions.
> One of the only reasons I remain in the guild, since there is precious little reason to actually be a member, is for the magazine.  I used to read it cover to cover.  Now I glance at it and pitch.  Mr. Gelb apparently got his wish:  he has effectively turned a fierce beast into a lap dog for the Met.
> Opinions may vary, of course.
> -----Original Message----- From: David Coco
> Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2016 8:25 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Opera News Online
> Is it just me, or does anyone else feel that  the latest re-vamp of Opera News made it even worse? First of all, it is now practically a leaflet - it doesn’t even have a spline. In the old days, if you wanted to save copies, you could at least shelve them and tell which issue was which. Now it just seems to be a bunch of People-type hype with fancy photography. The in-depth features about the broadcasts are gone. Along with the visually ugly Gelb productions, Opera News seems to be another casualty of his administration.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> T------------------------------------------------------------------------

OPERA-L on Facebook:
To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message to [log in to unmask]
containing only the words:  SIGNOFF OPERA-L
To stay subscribed but TURN OFF mail, send a message to
[log in to unmask] containing only the words:  SET OPERA-L NOMAIL
Modify your settings:

Back to: Top of Message | Previous Page | Main OPERA-L Page



CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager