Greetings to all listers,
I must take up cudgels again in this Covent Garden "Die Walküre" matter.
There have been some totally irrelevant comments from some illustrious people.
Firstly, the matter of the telecast is a matter for the BBC not Covent
Garden. Is any one [ even those in America] suggesting that Covent Garden blocked
the telecast because Bryn Terfel wasn't singing? That is plainly ridiculous.
Is anyone suggesting Terfel has the clout to block such a telecast when he
isn't singing because he is indisposed? Preposterous. What would happen if that
applied to all singers? Well, end of telecast opera is the first thing that
comes to mind...no sane broadcasting executive would walk so far out on a
dodgy tightrope. Let all singers have a clause in their contract to say that if
they are indisposed there will be no telecast, if arranged? Ludicrous.
The Royal Opera House told the audience that Terfel wasn't singing. Mind you
the Opera House didn't offer the audience their money back. Actually those
in the audience get the best of both worlds; they see Robert Hale live, and
Bryn Terfel on the TV!
Secondly, the BBC didn't tell their audience until the end of Act 1 that
that was all they were getting. This is the licence-paying BBC audience. This is
the BBC licence-paying audience who also pay their taxes which produce a
subsidy for the Opera House. The BBC spokesperson was an ex-Government Minister,
person of authority and credibility. That's why I said I felt cheated in my
email yesterday, and why the audience may not have felt that in the theatre.
The matter of the DVD is paramount here. One realises commercial issues but
in a telecast of live opera there is always the potential for a cancellation
by a prominent singer, and if a live telecast is scheduled, it should go ahead
if the performance takes place.Surely the broadcasting company has made some
sort of contract with the public by scheduling the event. What would happen
in sport if David Beckham, the illustrious and famed soccer player was
dropped by England...would the BBC refuse to televise the match? I remember a
Glyndebourne performance of "Simon Boccanegra" in 1998 in which the baritone fell
out late and was replaced by the Italian baritone Giancarlo Pasquetto, never
heard of before or since, but the BBC went ahead and broadcast it. Why the
difference??? The comment from someone that Robert Hale might have blocked
the telecast because he wasn't ready to be recorded on TV is highly unlikely. It
might well have been his last chance, given his seniority.
The obvious conclusion to be drawn, despite Mike Richter's innocent and
ingenuous comments, is that commercial pressures have influenced the BBC's
scheduling. I know that won't be of any importance to people outside the UK but
it's a heck of a significant moment in the broadcasting of the arts in the UK,
if it's true.
It will be interesting to discover which commercial company issues the DVDs
of this BBC/Covent Garden Ring Cycle, eventually. If it is the same company
which has allegedly given a free gift amounting to millions of pounds worth of
recording equipment to CG for an archive project I will draw another obvious
Regards to all
Roger D Bell
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
For help on commands, files, pictures, etc., visit the homepage: